<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intellectual Property Colloquium Podcast: Suggestions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewapeterson.com/2008/11/intellectual-property-colloquium-podcast-suggestions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewapeterson.com/2008/11/intellectual-property-colloquium-podcast-suggestions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 23:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Lichtman</title>
		<link>http://andrewapeterson.com/2008/11/intellectual-property-colloquium-podcast-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Lichtman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewapeterson.com/?p=1549#comment-808</guid>
		<description>Andrew -

Wow.  Thanks for taking the time to do that.  We have been working on some of these issues (like the cut-and-paste problem, which we think we can fix) but, well, it&#039;s really helpful to get a thoughtful kick-in-the-pants.  I have to say that I really love the look-and-feel of the site, but I do hear you when you point out some of the remaining shortfalls.  Anyway, I&#039;m working with a great techy guy (Chris Moen) to get the site clean and nice, and we&#039;ll totally talk all this through tonight.  In the meantime, though, thanks so much -- both for the kind words about the show, and for the thoughtful suggestions on how to improve it.  I really do appreciate the post.

Warm regards,
Doug Lichtman
&quot;the guy behind ipcolloquium.com&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew -</p>
<p>Wow.  Thanks for taking the time to do that.  We have been working on some of these issues (like the cut-and-paste problem, which we think we can fix) but, well, it&#8217;s really helpful to get a thoughtful kick-in-the-pants.  I have to say that I really love the look-and-feel of the site, but I do hear you when you point out some of the remaining shortfalls.  Anyway, I&#8217;m working with a great techy guy (Chris Moen) to get the site clean and nice, and we&#8217;ll totally talk all this through tonight.  In the meantime, though, thanks so much &#8212; both for the kind words about the show, and for the thoughtful suggestions on how to improve it.  I really do appreciate the post.</p>
<p>Warm regards,<br />
Doug Lichtman<br />
&#8220;the guy behind ipcolloquium.com&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://andrewapeterson.com/2008/11/intellectual-property-colloquium-podcast-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewapeterson.com/?p=1549#comment-790</guid>
		<description>Agreed - all really good points, especially the 5 points you listed for reasons to not use Flash-based design. Very clear and precise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed &#8211; all really good points, especially the 5 points you listed for reasons to not use Flash-based design. Very clear and precise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrewapeterson</title>
		<link>http://andrewapeterson.com/2008/11/intellectual-property-colloquium-podcast-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator>andrewapeterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewapeterson.com/?p=1549#comment-789</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Maybe you&#039;re right.  I&#039;ll give it a few days.  I mean who doesn&#039;t at least Google themselves or their company/organisation these days?

I suspect that I&#039;ll be on the front page for some of those searches in a few days, if not later tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Maybe you&#8217;re right.  I&#8217;ll give it a few days.  I mean who doesn&#8217;t at least Google themselves or their company/organisation these days?</p>
<p>I suspect that I&#8217;ll be on the front page for some of those searches in a few days, if not later tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arin Crumley</title>
		<link>http://andrewapeterson.com/2008/11/intellectual-property-colloquium-podcast-suggestions/comment-page-1/#comment-788</link>
		<dc:creator>Arin Crumley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewapeterson.com/?p=1549#comment-788</guid>
		<description>Nice post andrew, all good points, but if they aren&#039;t up on RSS there is also a good chance they don&#039;t have track backs, technorati alerts or google alerts to notify them you are talking about them.  So maybe a message to them directly is also in order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post andrew, all good points, but if they aren&#8217;t up on RSS there is also a good chance they don&#8217;t have track backs, technorati alerts or google alerts to notify them you are talking about them.  So maybe a message to them directly is also in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

