<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Podcasting Adoption.  RSS/Atom Adoption.  Some Thoughts.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andrewapeterson.com/2007/12/podcasting-adoption-rssatom-adoption-some-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andrewapeterson.com/2007/12/podcasting-adoption-rssatom-adoption-some-thoughts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:59:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: arincrumley</title>
		<link>http://andrewapeterson.com/2007/12/podcasting-adoption-rssatom-adoption-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>arincrumley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 01:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewapeterson.com/2007/12/01/podcasting-adoption-rssatom-adoption-some-thoughts/#comment-497</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m down with all of this, except the thing about cities vs suburbs.  I&#039;m in New York City and still have to explain RSS and subscribing to podcasts to people.  Meanwhile there are a lot of very technically savy people outside of major cities.  But I&#039;m down with calling it a feed.  &quot;Subscribe to our feed for free in iTunes.&quot;  Thats still too much emphasis on iTunes.

Another good thing to do would be for Miro to take off like Firefox did.  Miro is an open source alternative.  If that was popular then people would have to stop talking about iTunes all the time trying to get that foot in the door with an audience.  Instead they could just let audiences know there is a feed of their show and that implies the viewer can use the platform of their choice to subscribe.

We might be able to say, &quot;Welcome to the Four Eyed Monsters Feed&quot; in our upcoming episodes.  I was also thinking of saying, &quot;Welcome to the Four Eyed Monsters Video Channel.&quot;  Still not sure.  Part of me feels sad I can&#039;t just keep saying, &quot;welcome to the Four Eyed Monsters Video Podcast.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m down with all of this, except the thing about cities vs suburbs.  I&#8217;m in New York City and still have to explain RSS and subscribing to podcasts to people.  Meanwhile there are a lot of very technically savy people outside of major cities.  But I&#8217;m down with calling it a feed.  &#8220;Subscribe to our feed for free in iTunes.&#8221;  Thats still too much emphasis on iTunes.</p>
<p>Another good thing to do would be for Miro to take off like Firefox did.  Miro is an open source alternative.  If that was popular then people would have to stop talking about iTunes all the time trying to get that foot in the door with an audience.  Instead they could just let audiences know there is a feed of their show and that implies the viewer can use the platform of their choice to subscribe.</p>
<p>We might be able to say, &#8220;Welcome to the Four Eyed Monsters Feed&#8221; in our upcoming episodes.  I was also thinking of saying, &#8220;Welcome to the Four Eyed Monsters Video Channel.&#8221;  Still not sure.  Part of me feels sad I can&#8217;t just keep saying, &#8220;welcome to the Four Eyed Monsters Video Podcast.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Greenlee</title>
		<link>http://andrewapeterson.com/2007/12/podcasting-adoption-rssatom-adoption-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Greenlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewapeterson.com/2007/12/01/podcasting-adoption-rssatom-adoption-some-thoughts/#comment-496</guid>
		<description>With the introduction 3 weeks ago of podcasts on the Zune we can hopefully start to open up the meaning of podcasts to orient more towards content then device.

Like it or not, the term podcast in this context is here to stay for the forseeable future until we get back to the point that downloadable content that even includes music is just considered &quot;Audio&quot; and &quot;Video&quot;.

I am hoping that the technology of podcasting disappears and one-click subscriptions dominates.

Rob Greenlee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the introduction 3 weeks ago of podcasts on the Zune we can hopefully start to open up the meaning of podcasts to orient more towards content then device.</p>
<p>Like it or not, the term podcast in this context is here to stay for the forseeable future until we get back to the point that downloadable content that even includes music is just considered &#8220;Audio&#8221; and &#8220;Video&#8221;.</p>
<p>I am hoping that the technology of podcasting disappears and one-click subscriptions dominates.</p>
<p>Rob Greenlee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
